Does delay in initiation of intravenous antibiotics correlate with wound
infections in children with open fractures?
Chintada Anil. Kumar1, Nathi Anil. Kumar.2
1Dr. Anil Kumar Chintada, Senior Resident, Department
of Orthopaedics, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamilnadu, 2Dr.
Anil Kumar Nathi, Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Great
Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Corresponding Author: Dr Anil Kumar Nathi, Flat no 202, Celesta, Aarthika
Empire, D No 9-14-1, CBM Compound, VIP Road, Balajinagar, Visakhapatnam, Andhra
Pradesh, 530003, India. E-mail: anilnathi@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction: One of the common complications of open
fractures is an infection which may be dependent on the time of administration
of antibiotics. The study aimed to determine the prevalence of wound infection
due to the delay in the interval between the initiation of intravenous (IV)
antibiotics and time of paediatrics open injury. Materials and Methods:
Retrospective observational study included paediatrics patients (0 to 16 years)
with open fractures. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify
patients with open fracture, who were treated between May 2012 and October 2013
at the tertiary care centre. The time between the injury and the first dose of
intravenous antibiotic was calculated from transfer and hospital records.
Fracture groups were stratified according to the severity of soft-tissue damage
as determined with use of the Gustilo- Anderson system for the classification
of open fractures. Results: Sixty patients with 84 open fractures were
included in this study. Majority of 31.58% of participants had type III B
Gustilo - Anderson fracture type. The proportion of grade IIIA, I, III C and II
fracture was 29.82%, 21.05%, 14.04% and 3.51% respectively. 43 (71.6%) received IV antibiotics within 6
hours of injury of which eight had documented wound infections. Of the 17 (28%)
patients who received IV antibiotics after 6 hours, 7 (41%) were diagnosed with
wound infections. The incidence of infection was high in higher grades of
Gustilo- Anderson opens injuries. Conclusion: The immediate
administration of appropriate antibiotics on presentation is crucial to
minimise the risk of infection in children.
Keywords: Antibiotics, Open Fracture, Orthopaedics,
Polytrauma, Paediatric
Author Corrected: 10th March 2019 Accepted for Publication: 14th March 2019
Introduction
Open fractures are defined as a break in the
skin allowing the direct communication of fracture site or fracture hematoma
with the external elements. In addition, all the fractures in the vicinity of
any break in the skin should be treated as open fracture [1].
Open fracture makes about 10% of all paediatricorthopaedic
injuries and 25- 50% of polytraumatised children have an open orthopaedic
injury. Skaggs et al. have found the leg (34%) as the most common site for open
fractures and the forearm (32%) as the second most common site[2]. In this series, the involvement of the
femur and humerus were 6.7 % and 6.5% respectively. The most common cause of
open fractures is road traffic accidents with significant involvement of
motorbikes in lower limb injuries. Fall from a height is an important cause of
open injuries in the upper limb [2].
Open fractures in children differ from those
in adults in many ways. Thicker and more active periosteum provides greater
fracture stability and leads to more rapid and reliable fracture-healing in
young children compared with that in older children and adults. Young children
have a greater potential for periosteal bone formation and can even
reconstitute bone in the face of bone loss. Common complications of open fractures
are infection, neurovascular injury, delayed union, non-union and loss of
function. Infection rates in children with open fractures have been reported to
be lower than those in adults with such fractures [3].
According to guidelines of Advanced Trauma
Life Support (ATLS)/ Paediatric Advanced Life Support, emergent administration
(within 6 hours of injury) of appropriate antibiotics is essential to decrease
the risk of infection. The stabilisation of unstable fractures is usually
beneficial, although children may require less rigidity than adults. If the
viability of soft tissue is in doubt, debridement should be deferred until a
later operation, as the superior healing potential of young children may produce
unexpected recovery [4].
Associated injuries are common with open
fractures in children, and serial examinations over time often uncover these
injuries[5]. This study analyses the interval between
the time of open injury and initiation of intravenous (IV) antibiotics in the
Emergency Department.
Materials and Methods
Study area and duration:A retrospective chart review was performed to
identify patients in whom an open fracture had been treated between May 2012
and October 2013, at a tertiary care centre.
Inclusion Criteria: The study population consisted of open injuries as classified by
Gustilo-Anderson classification in the age from 0 to 16 years. All open
injuries including fractures, lacerations exposing bones, heel pad avulsions,
vascular injuries and traumatic amputations were included in the study.
Eighty consecutive patients with 104 open
fractures were identified.
Exclusion criteria: Patients with injuries that resulted in death, patients who have had preliminary
treatment elsewhere before coming to our institution and few patients due to
lack of proper documentation (eight) were not included in the study.
Follow up: Patients were followed until there was radiographic and clinical
evidence of union with absence or resolution of infection. Thus, 60 patients
with 84 open fractures (and/or) extensive soft tissue injuries were included in
this study.
Surgical procedure: The standard protocol at our institution was for intravenous antibiotics
to be administered to all children with open fractures upon arrival in the
emergency department and subsequently to be continued for at least forty-eight
hours. The time between the injury and the first dose of intravenous
antibiotics was calculated from transfer and hospital records. All times were
rounded to the nearest hour.
Fracture groups were stratified according to
the severity of soft-tissue damage as determined with use of the
Gustilo-Anderson system for the classification of open fractures [6]: -
Type I Wound <1 cm long, clean
Type II Wound >1 cm long, without
extensive soft-tissue damage
Type III Massive soft-tissue damage,
compromised vascularity, severe wound contamination, marked fracture
instability
The location of the fracture was recorded. A
fracture was considered to be infected if any one of three conditions was met:
(1) The patient had positive intra-operative
cultures and was subsequently managed with antibiotics or additional surgical
debridement,
(2) The patient did not have positive
cultures but was managed with subsequent surgery or antibiotics for the
treatment of infection, or
(3) The patient had a clinical diagnosis of
infection, based on time taken for wound healing, serous discharge from wound.
These criteria were intentionally rigid to make certain that we did not miss
any cases of infection. Patients who had a single positive culture but had no
clinical evidence of infection and no additional treatment were not considered
to have an infection. Both deep and superficial infections were considered
together. There were no cases of late infection. Pin-site infections resulting
from external fixators were not considered to be wound infections.
Statistical Analysis:The data were analysed in two parts Average time delay between the time
of open injury and the administration of the first dose of intravenous
antibiotics in accident and emergency department of a tertiary care teaching
hospital. Comparison of percentages of wound infection in children between
those who received intravenous antibiotics within 6 hours and those who
received after 6 hours of injury was done using Chi square test.
Results
Sixty patients with open injuries who
presented to the Accident and Emergency Department of a tertiary care centre
not having received preliminary treatment elsewhere were included in the study.
Of these, 33 children were below 11 years of age, and 27 children were above 11
years of age. 42 children out of 60 were boys, and 18 children were girls. Six
children (18%) out of 33 under 11 years of age, and eight children (29.6%) out
of 27 over 11 years of age were diagnosed with wound infections. 43 (71.67%)
participants had <6 hours IV antibiotics and remaining 17 (28.33%) participants
had >6 hours IV antibiotics (table 1). Majority of 31.58% of participants
had type III B Gustilo - Anderson fracture type. The proportion of grade III A,
I,III C and II fracture was 29.82%, 21.05%, 14.04% and 3.51% respectively.
(Table 1)
Table-1: Descriptive analysis of baseline characteristic in the study
population (N=60)
Parameter |
Frequency |
Percentage |
Age group |
||
<11 years |
33 |
55% |
>11 years |
27 |
45% |
Gender |
||
Male/Boys |
42 |
70% |
Female/girls |
18 |
30% |
Gustilo-Anderson fracture type |
||
I |
12 |
21.05% |
II |
2 |
3.51% |
III A |
17 |
29.82% |
III B |
18 |
31.58% |
III C |
8 |
14.04% |
IV antibiotics |
|
|
<6 hours |
43 |
71.67% |
>6 hours |
17 |
28.33% |
Wound infection |
|
|
Yes |
14 |
23.33% |
No |
46 |
76.67% |
Figure 1: Comparison of incidence of infection with timing of
antibiotics therapy (N=60)
Of the 60 patients, 43 (71.6%) received IV
antibiotics within 6 hours of injury of which eight had documented wound
infections. Of the 17 (28%) patients who received IV antibiotics after 6 hours,
7 (41%) were diagnosed with wound infections. The difference in the proportion
of incidence of infection between antibiotics therapy was statistically not
significant (P value 0.069) (Figure 2).
Table-2: Types of injuries and wound infection among 60 children
Gustilo - Anderson Fracture TYPE |
I |
II |
IIIA |
IIIB |
IIIC |
Number of children
N (%) |
12 (20%) |
2 (3%) |
17 (28%) |
18 (30%) |
8 (13%) |
IV Antibiotics <
6hrs |
11/12(91.6%) |
0/2 (0%) |
9/17(53%) |
12/18 (66.6%) |
6/8(75%) |
IV Antibiotics
>6hrs |
1/12(8%) |
2/2(100%) |
8/17(47%) |
6/18 (33%) |
2/8 (11%) |
Number of infected
cases |
0 |
0 |
2(11.7%) |
8 (44%) |
5 (62.5%) |
<6hrs – Infected |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4(33%) |
3 (50%) |
>6hrs –Infected |
0 |
0 |
2 (25%) |
4 (67%) |
2 (100%) |
The incidence of infection was high in higher
grades of Gustilo - Anderson opens injuries, which increases with an increase
in the severity of the injury, especially those who received IV antibiotics
after 6 hours of injury. (Table 2)
Discussion
Prompt administration of antibiotics is
clearly an important way to minimise the risk of infection associated with open
fractures. In our retrospective audit
with 60 patients, 18.6% (8/43) of patients who received IV antibiotics within 6
hours of injury, had wound infection when compared to 41%(7/17) of patients who
received IV antibiotics after 6 hours of injury, which is less than half the
percentage of wound infection seen in the latter group. 71.6% of children
received the first dose of IV antibiotic in Accident and Emergency department,
within 6 hours of injury minimising the infection rate to 18.6% when compared
to 41% of infection in children who received IV antibiotics after 6 hours of
injury, which is recommended according to ATLS/PALS guidelines. The incidence
of infection is high in higher grades of Gustilo - Anderson opens injuries,
which increases with increase in the severity of the injury, especially those
who received IV antibiotics after 6 hours of injury, as shown in the above
table.
Patzakis et al[5] in 1989 found in their study that the single
most important factor in reducing the infection rate was the early
administration of antibiotics that provide antibacterial activity against both
gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms.
Similarly, Lack WD et al [7] in Multivariate analysis found antibiotics
beyond 66 minutes (odds ratio, 3.78; 95% CI, 1.16-12.31; P = 0.03)
independently predicted infection. Immediate antibiotics and early coverage
limited the infection rate (1 of 36, 2.8%).
Swanson, T.V., et al[8] concluded that there is an increase in
infection rate in the presence of wound contamination, delay in treatment
greater than twenty-four hours, or systemic illness.
Merritt, in a study of seventy patients with
open fractures, concluded that the time between injury and treatment in the
emergency room was not correlated with infection rate, nor was the time between
treatment in the emergency room and debridement in the operating room
correlated with infection rate[9]. Also, Skaggs, D. L., et al[1] found in their large multicentre study, that
the infection rate was 3% (twelve of 344) for fractures that had been treated
within six hours after the injury, compared with 2% (four of 210) for those
that had been treated at least seven hours after the injury; this difference
was not significant (p = 0.43). When the fractures were separated according to
the Gustilo and Anderson classification system, there were no significant
differences in the infection rate between those that had been treated within
six hours after the injury and those that had been treated at least seven hours
after the injury. These findings were in
accordance with the current study.
Gustilo– Anderson grading system was used in
the study. It provides a prognostic framework that guides treatment and
facilitates communication among surgeons and clinician-scientists. Decades of
research correlating the Gustilo-Anderson type with infection risk have helped
refine surgical protocols, change antibiotic recommendations, and determine the
appropriate timing for interventions including debridement, internal fixation,
and soft tissue coverage[10-12].
It was also seen in the present study that
the infection was more associated with respect to grade III B followed by grade
III A injuries. Harley, B. J., et al[13] found in the multivariate regression model
that time was not a significant factor in predicting either non-union or
infection (p > 0.05). The strongest determinants for non-union were found to
be the presence of infection and grade of injury (p < 0.05). The strongest
predictors for the development of a deep infection were fracture grade and a
lower extremity fracture (p < 0.05).
Noumi, T., et al [14]concluded following a multivariate analysis
that Gustilo type significantly correlated with the occurrence of deep
infection (p<0.05). Non-union occurred in 12 fractures (14.1%). Multivariate
analysis revealed that only fracture grade by AO type significantly correlated
with the occurrence of non-union (p<0.02).
The present study has only taken into
consideration delay in antibiotic administration on the rate of infection
following open fractures in children, which is one of many factors that may
cause infection. The confounders were not considered in the study, and the
small sample size and retrospective nature of the study reduces the
generalizability of the study. The findings of the present study suggest that
in children who receive early antibiotic therapy following an open fracture
offers little benefit over late administration. However, a large size cohort
study is needed to finalise the exact relationship between the timing of
antibiotic administration and risk of infection in the case of open fractures
in children.
Conclusion
Open fractures in children present special
challenges. The immediate administration of appropriate antibiotics on
presentation is crucial to minimise the risk of infection. Formal operative
debridement of all open fractures is a time-honoured principle, although
whether operative treatment within six hours rather than twenty-four hours
influence the infection rate is controversial. However thorough debridement and
irrigation of the wound with careful soft-tissue management are recommended
which remain as the mainstay of treatment.
Contributions by authors: Dr. Chintada AK was involved in designing the study, data
collection, co-ordinating the data analysis, writing the manuscript and
approving the final draft. Dr. Nathi Ak had played supporting role in
finalizing the study proposal, monitored the data quality, conducted review of
literature and was involved in editing of all the drafts and approval of the
final draft.
Study’s addition to existing knowledge: The study flashed light on the importance of
timing of administration of antibiotic and risk of infection among open
fractures in children. Appropriate antibiotic course can prevent development of
major risk of infections. Future studies can be planned as prospective long
term followup studies.
Reference
1.
Skaggs DL, Friend L, Alman B, Chambers HG, Schmitz M, Leake B, et al.
The effect of surgical delay on acute infection following 554 open
fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(1):8-12.[pubmed]
2. Kay RM, Skaggs DL. Pediatric polytrauma management. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006;26(2):268-77.[pubmed]
3.Tscherne H, Sudkamp N. [Open fractures in children]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1985;123(4):490-7.[pubmed]
4. Kleinman ME, de Caen AR, Chameides L, Atkins DL, Berg RA, Berg MD,
et al. Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International
Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular
Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Pediatrics.
2010;126(5):e1261-318.[pubmed]
5. Patzakis MJ, Wilkins J. Factors influencing infection rate in open fracture wounds. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989(243):36-40.[pubmed]
6. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of
one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones:
retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
1976;58(4):453-8.[pubmed]
7. Lack WD, Karunakar MA, Angerame MR, Seymour RB, Sims S, Kellam JF,
et al. Type III open tibia fractures: immediate antibiotic prophylaxis
minimizes infection. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(1):1-6.[pubmed]
8. Swanson TV, Szabo RM, Anderson DD. Open hand fractures: prognosis and classification. J Hand Surg Am. 1991;16(1):101-7.[pubmed]
9. Merritt K. Factors increasing the risk of infection in patients with open fractures. J Trauma. 1988;28(6):823-7.[pubmed]
10. Kim PH, Leopold SS. In brief: Gustilo-Anderson classification. [corrected]. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(11):3270-4.[pubmed]
11. Gosselin RA, Roberts I, Gillespie WJ. Antibiotics for preventing
infection in open limb fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2004(1):CD003764.[pubmed]
12. Ostermann PA, Seligson D, Henry SL. Local antibiotic therapy for
severe open fractures. A review of 1085 consecutive cases. J Bone Joint
Surg Br. 1995;77(1):93-7.[pubmed]
13. Harley BJ, Beaupre LA, Jones CA, Dulai SK, Weber DW. The effect of
time to definitive treatment on the rate of nonunion and infection in
open fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16(7):484-90. [pubmed]
14. Noumi T, Yokoyama K, Ohtsuka H, Nakamura K, Itoman M.
Intramedullary nailing for open fractures of the femoral shaft:
evaluation of contributing factors on deep infection and nonunion using
multivariate analysis. Injury. 2005;36(9):1085-93.[pubmed]
How to cite this article?
Chintada Anil. Kumar, Nathi Anil. Kumar. Does delay in initiation of intravenous antibiotics correlate with wound infections in children with open fractures?. Surgical Update: Int J surg Orthopedics. 2019;5(1):60-64.doi:10.17511/ ijoso. 2019.i1.10.