Orthogonal dual plating for fracture of base of 1st metacarpal- original study

Shah H.D.1, Gupta A.2

1Dr. Himanshu D. Shah, Assistant Professor, 2Dr. Amit Gupta, 3rd Year Resident Doctor, all authors are affiliated with Department of Orthopaedics, Govt. Medical College, Vadodara, Gujrat, India

 

Corresponding Author: Dr. Himanshu D. Shah, Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Govt. Medical College, Vadodara, Gujarat. Postal Address: 90/B, Adhar Society, Behind Suryanagar, Waghodia Road, Vadodara, Gujarat. E-mail- himanshuortho82@gmail.com


Abstract

Background: Treatment of fractures of the base of 1st metacarpal is controversial with multimodality of implant choice available like k wire and miniplates. Secondary displacement rates are higher if fracture is not fixed rigidly. In this study, dual miniplates were used in orthogonal manner to fix the 1st metacarpal base fractures. Method: all patients were treated using dual miniplates in orthogonal manner by dorso volar approach to evaluate functional outcome. Results: On follow up, all the patients reported excellent functional outcome with regard to DASH score, Kapandji score and pinch comparison as compared to opposite side. Conclusion: orthogonal dual miniplates used for fixation of base of thumb metacarpal provides excellent method to rigidly fix the inherently unstable fracture and favouring early mobilization.

Key words: First metacarpal, Fracture, miniplates, base of 1st metacarpal


Manuscript Received: 26th November 2018 Reviewed: 6 th December 2018 

Author Corrected: 14th December 2018 Accepted for Publication: 17th December 2018

Introduction

Fractures of the thumb metacarpal are unique and require a distinct discussion as it has multidirectional mobility with compensatory motion of the adjacent joints [1]. Thumb metacarpal accounts for around 12% of all metacarpal fractures [2]. Thumb stability is essential for most of the hand functions whether the fracture is intra articular or extra articular at base of thumb metacarpal. Intra articular fractures of base of 1st metacarpal are Rolando and Bennet fracture dislocation. Displaced intra-articular fractures or persistent subluxation or dislocation can cause limitation of motion, pain and weakness of pinch and of grip [3]. Secondary metacarpophalangeal joint hyperextension deformities can follow thumb basal joint dorsal displacement and severely weaken hand function.

Accurate reduction and stable fixation with anatomy restoration of 1st metacarpal base fractures is essential for good functional outcome after intra-articular or extra articular fracture of base of thumb metacarpal. Conservative treatment of the base of first metacarpal base results into mal-union with gross deformity with functional derangement and later on arthritis. Fixation of 1st metacarpal base by kirschner wire is described in literature. There is still paucity of literature and persistent controversy regarding accurate and stable anatomical fixation. We have used Dorsoradial approach for open reduction of the fractures of base of first metacarpal and fixation Using dual miniplates in orthogonal position to achieve rigid fixation of the 1st metacarpal base fractures which is the purpose of this article.

Materials and Method

In this prospective study, seven patients with closed fracture of base of 1st metacarpal either intra articular or extra articular admitted in the hospital at Government Medical College, Vadodara, from March 2017 to April 2018 were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were isolated closed fracture of base of first metacarpal either intra articular or extra articular. Open grade fractures and fractures extending into the shaft of metacarpal were excluded. Fractures of the base of first metacarpal associated with other hand fractures were also excluded to reduce bias in final follow up scores. However, patients with lower limb injuries were included in the study. After preoperative analysis, all patients were operated under regional anesthesia and with tourniquet control by corresponding author and assisted by secondary author. Wagner incision was used in all the subjects at the dorsoradial aspect of the wrist curving volarward at the wrist crease. After soft tissue dissection, the fracture is reduced and temporarily held with k- wire. Single miniplate is temporarily fixed using k wire in buttressing mode for intraarticular fractures. For extra articular fractures, the first single miniplate is temporarily fixed with k wires on the surface with convexity of fracture. Plate position is confirmed under IITV and fixations using mini screws were done. Proximal fragment would accommodate either single or two screws. For rotational stability, another mini plate at orthogonal position is fixed using additional mini screws such that proximal fracture fragment had rotational stability at fracture. Surgical wound is sutured in layers.

Postoperatively on 2nd day, intermittent thumb mobilization was allowed immediately as tolerated with thumb splint for rest of the period of the day. Patient is followed every 2 weeks interval for at least 3 months or till union occurs.

At final follow up, assessment was done using pain score, DASH score, Kapandji score and pinch comparison to opposite side. Pain score was assessed using VAS score in which score 0 represents no pain and 8 represents severe pain beyond tolerance [4]. Pain score of 0 to 2 represents mild pain, 3 to 5 represents moderate while 6 to 8 shows severe pain with 8 being pain as bad it could be. DASH score is nomenclature used for Disability Arm, Shoulder and Hand score. DASH score considers 30 items disability questionnaire with score of 0 (no disability) to 100. The mean change in the disability percentage was reported [5]. Kapandji score is thumb opposition score from 0 (no thumb opposition) to 10 (full thumb opposition score) [6]. Pinch and grip strength was noted as compared to contra lateral side.

Results

In our study, out of 7 patients, 5 were males and 2 were female patients. 4 fractures of 1st metacarpal base were intra articular and 3 patients were extra articular. Out of four intra articular fractures, 3 were male patients and one was female patient. In extra articular type, one patient was female and rest were male patients. Two patients had associated lower limb injuries. The average ages of patients were 33 years. All patients underwent surgery at an average of 1 days after trauma with Wagner approach with dual plates in orthogonal mode. Patients were allowed mobilization immediately postoperative with average of 2nd postoperative day. All the patients were followed up at 2 weeks interval till the time of union or at least 3 months. Outcome evaluation consisted of pain score, DASH score, kapandji score and pinch comparison to contralateral side. At final follow up, average pain scroe was 1.8/10. Mean improvement in DASH score was 94% with grip and pinch strength 97% and 94% respectively as compared to opposite side. At final follow up kapandji score noted as 9. There is no statistically significant difference in intraarticular or extra articular fracture patients with regard to final outcome scores which was attributed to anatomical reduction and stable fixation. The range of union time was 10-18 weeks.

Discussion

Fracture of base of thumb metacarpal can be either intra articular or extra articular fractures. The intra articular fractures can be further subdivided into Bennett and Rolando fractures. Fractures of base of 1st metacarpal occur when the thumb is axially loaded and partially flexed. The fracture pattern of intra articular extension has a typical oblique course creating small triangular fragment on the volar ulnar aspect of the metacarpal base. This fragment remains in its position by anterior oblique ligament and shaft region of metacarpal is displaced proximally by pull of abductor pollicis longus with adduction force exerted by adductor pollicis [7]. This typical pattern is observed in Bennett fracture. The Rolando fracture is intra articular variety without shaft displacement mainly Y shaped configuration of intraarticular fragment.

Extraarticular fractures of 1st metacarpal base results in shortening of 1st metacarpal effective length due to muscle forces resulting in loss of effectiveness of all thumb muscles’ function and may lead to retraction of 1st web space resulting in weakness of pinch. Non operative treatment of undisplaced fractures of base of 1st metacarpal are recommended with literature support of good functional outcome. Displaced fracture of 1st metacarpal base requires surgical intervention to achieve adequate thumb function. Post traumatic arthritis is another common complication following conservative management of intra articular fracture of base of thumb metacarpal 1 mm in congruency of joint surface results in arthrosis at joint and the reason for continued pain postoperatively [8]. Malunion resulting from extra articular fractures not only results into deformity demonstrated that each 2 mm shortening resulted in 7degrees of secondary extensor lag and 8% loss of power generation by muscles. This can be compensated by hyperextension at MCP joint but only up to 20 degrees. So more than 6mm shortening requires revision ORIF to reduce the deformity and to improve grip.1 cm shortening results in only 55% of muscles optimum power generation [9,10].

Conventionally kirschner wires are used to fix the base of first metacarpal fractures. Mini screws are also modality of treatment. In these technique, the fractures are reduced by the countering the deforming forces with longitudinal traction, thumb pronation, and adduction of the metacarpal base. These modalities of treatment require 4 to 6 weeks of immobilization to maintain reduction and to prevent secondary displacement. Intra articular fractures treated with conventional modalities like k wires or screws resulted in posttraumatic arthritis due to in congruency of joint [1]. In T shaped or Y shaped Rolando fracture, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning is difficult to achieve as all intraarticular fragments needs to be aligned. In such fractures, classic 3 piece fractures requires ORIF using Wagner approach as reported by Diaz Garcia et al [1].Anatomical reduction and stable fixation is recommended to achieve good functional outcome and to avoid post traumatic arthritis [11]. Single plate with miniscrews is also recommended for fixation of metacarpal fractures. Diaconu M. And colleagues reported secondary displacement in around 20% of operated patients treated with single mini T plate. They reported that locking T plate did not provide sufficient strength for fixation to allow early mobilization [3]. These can be attributed to rotational instability due to less number of screws accommodated in the plate in proximal fragment. This drawback can be overcome by using dual plate at orthogonal position to acquire rotational stability in proximal fragment. Buttressing effect of dual plates placed orthogonally contributes to early mobilization without loss of reduction.

Maximillian et al reported that ORIF with rigid internal fixation with modern hardware expedite return to athletic activity [12]. Dual plating provides more rigid internal fixation as compared to single plate which can lead to secondary displacement in upto 20% of patients as reported by Diaconu et al [3]. Abid H. Et al also reported better thumb apposition and retroposition with ORIF [13]. In our study we applied the dual plating orthogonal principle in all 7 patients to achieve anatomical reduction and stable fixation for early mobilization without secondary displacement risk with excellent functional outcome.

Alternate

Figure-1: includes preoperative, and postoperative xray And IITV images intraoperatively.

Alternate

Figure 2: shows intra operative image with dual plate in orthogonal manner.

Till now in the literature, there is no study reported which shows dual plating method of first metacarpal base. Methods described in the literature till now were associated with different complications. Dual plating of the first metacarpal base fractures is novel technique to give adequate stability for fracture union in anatomical position with excellent functional outcome.

Conclusion

In conclusion, dual plating of first metacarpal base can be a gold standard technique to rigidly fix the fracture for excellent functional outcome. This requires future study of large number of patients with long term outcome as our study has less number of patients with short term outcome analysis.

Contribution by authors

All patients in this study were operated by corresponding author and assisted by second author. Manuscript primarily prepared by corresponding author with assistance provided by second author. Data collection was done by both authors.

References

1. Diaz-Garcia R, Waljee JF. Current management of metacarpal fractures. Hand Clin. 2013 Nov;29(4):507-18. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.09.004.[pubmed]

2. Bartelmann U, Dietsch V, Landsleitner B. [Fractures near the base of the first metacarpal bone--clinical outcome of 21 patients]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2000 Mar;32(2):93-101.[pubmed]

3. Diaconu M, Facca S, Gouzou S, et al. Locking plates for fixation of extra-articular fractures of the first metacarpal base: a series of 15 cases. Chir Main. 2011 Feb;30(1):26-30.
doi: 10.1016/j.main.2011.01.016. Epub 2011 Feb 4.[pubmed]

4. Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1:S17-24. Epub 2005 Dec 1.[pubmed]

5. Christina Gummesson, Isam Atroshi, Charlotte Ekdah. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcomequestionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2003; 4(11):1-6.

6. Leamy DJ, Kocijan J, Domijan K, et al. An exploration of EEG features during recovery following stroke - implications for BCI-mediated neurorehabilitation therapy. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Jan 28;11:9. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-9.[pubmed]

7. Soyer AD.Fractures of the base of the first Metacarpal-current treatment options. Journal American Acad. Orthopaedic Surgery.1999; Nov-Dec; 7(6):403-12.

8. Kollitz KM, Hammert WC, Vedder NB, et al. Metacarpal fractures: treatment and complications. Hand (N Y). 2014 Mar;9(1):16-23. doi: 10.1007/s11552-013-9562-1.[pubmed]

9. Al-Madawy AM, Elatta MM, Hasanin MM, et al. The Use of Minilocked Plate for Management of Unstable Metacarpal Fractures. J Hand Microsurg. 2016 Dec;8(3):159-164. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593730. Epub 2016 Oct 14.[pubmed]

10. Andrew J Watt et al. Biomechanical evaluation of metacarpal plate fixation- application of 90 degree internal fixation model. Hand 2015(10): 94-99.[pubmed]

11. van Niekerk JL, Ouwens R. Fractures of the base of the first metacarpal bone: results of surgical treatment. Injury. 1989 Nov;20(6):359-62.[pubmed]

12. Maximillian soong et al. Metacarpal fractures in Athletes. Cur Rev Musculoskeletal Med. 2013 (10): 23-27.

13. Abid H. Et al. Articular fracture of the base of the first metacarpal-comparative study between direct open fixation and extra focal pinning.Chir. Main 2015; 34(3):122-5.


How to cite this article?

Shah H.D, Gupta A. Orthogonal dual plating for fracture of base of 1st metacarpal- original study. Surgical Update: Int J surg Orthopedics.2018;4(4):165-168.doi:10.17511/ ijoso.2018.i4.06.