Prevalence
of helicobacter pylori infection in perforated duodenal ulcer in a rural
hospital
Prabhu S.G.1,
Abraham G.2
1Dr
Satish G Prabhu, Professor and unit Chief,2Dr George Abraham,
Assistant Professor, All authors are affiliated with the department of General
surgery, MOSC Medical College, Kolenchery,Medical College Road, PO Kolencherry,
Kochi, Kerala, India
Address for
Correspondence: Dr Satish G Prabhu. Email:
satish63g.prabhu@gmail.com
Abstract
Background: The
association of Helicobacter pylori with uncomplicated peptic ulcer disease is
well documented. The aim of this study was to observe the prevalence of
Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer perforation and to know the sensitivity
and specificity ofrapid urease test in detecting Helicobacter pylori on table. Methods: This retrospective
observational study was conducted at the department of General Surgery, MOSC
Medical college hospital KolencheryErnakulum for a period of twelve months from
February 2015 to February 2016.A total of fifty cases were included in the
study. After stabilization in the Emergency room they were taken up for
laparotomy and perforation closure after on table Rapid urease test was done.Specimen
from the perforation site was sent for histopathology examination by Giemsa
staining. Results: Fifty patients
with duodenal perforation were taken up for laparotomy and DU perforation
closure was done after on table one-minute rapid urease test.A specimen from
the perforation site was sent for pathological examination by Giemsa staining.
35 patients (70%) out of 50 patients were tested positive for Rapid urease
test. Of these 35 patients 20 patients (57%) had a previous history of APD and
15 patients presented with duodenal ulcerperforation for the first time. The
Sensitivity and specificity of rapid urease test was found to be 100%.Conclusion:The prevalence according to
our study of H.pylori in DU perforation is 70% and the Rapid urease test was
positive in those cases with a long duration of APD. The sensitivity and
specificity of One-minute rapid urease test is almost 100%.
Key words: DU
perforation, H.pylori, One minute Rapid urease test
Author Corrected: 14th August 2018 Accepted for Publication: 18th August 2018
Introduction
Perforated duodenal ulcer is one of the surgical
emergencies which we come across in our Emergency department.PerforatedDU(duodenal
ulcer) is a commonsurgical emergency all over the world with a mortality rate
up to 10-40% [1].Worldwide the incidence of peptic ulcer disease is said to
have fallen in recent years [2].However, the incidence of perforated duodenal
ulcers has either remained constant or has been increasing due to which there
has been increase in the incidence of emergency surgery. Perforation of the
duodenal ulcer is commonly seen in the first part of duodenum and occurs in about
5% to10%ofpatientswithactiveulcer disease [2].
Majority of the patients require surgery except for
a very few number of patients who have sealed off perforation. Mortality in
perforated DU is around 15% as per literature review.Helicobacter pylori(H.
pylori) is a gram-negative bacterium that infects almost 50% of people in
developed nations and up to 80% in developing countries [3]. Prevalence of
Helicobacter pylori is one of the risk factors for peptic ulcer disease. The
average prevalence ofH. pyloriinfection in patients with perforated peptic
ulcer is of only about 65–70%, which contrasts with the almost 90–100% [1].There
are many previousstudies showing prevalence of H.pylori in duodenal ulcer
perforation patients but none are available in the recent years [4].
Peptic ulcer disease continues to be a significant
health and economic burden in low and middle- income countries [5]. Eradication
of H. pylori after surgery has been proved to reduce recurrence rate and
complications [6].H.pylon infection of the gastric antral mucosa plays an important
role in the development of duodenal ulcer disease' and is of particular
importance in perforation [7].According to the currently followed model of the
pathogenesis of H. pylori relatedduodenalulcer,colonizationofduodenumbyh pyloriisthecriticalfinalstepresponsible
forthe chain of events leading to the lesion [8].Thus, presence of
duodenalcolonizationmightrepresentaveryhigh-risk
conditionforthedevelopmentofduodenalulcer and subsequent perforation.This
hypothesis has never been tested until now. This may be due to the fact that a
reliable identification of H. pylori in the duodenum is considered difficult,
as a low number of bacteriacolonizescatteredareasofduodenalgastric metaplasia
[8].
Dr J R Warren and DrBarry Marshall are credited with
the demonstration of Helicobacter pylori previously designated as Campylobacter
pyloriin patients with chronic gastritis and acid peptic disease [9]. The new
name Helicobacter pylori were suggested in 1989.The genus name reflects the two
morphological appearances of the organism, Helical in vivo and rod like in
vitro. Ever since its isolation H. Pylori has been the subject of several double-blind
studieswhich support the hypothesis that H. Pylori is a significant factor in
the etiology of acid peptic disease and associated with 60- 90% of peptic
ulcers [10].
MC Nulty et al were the first to identify H. pylori by
the urease test, later many modifications like the CLO test and Rapid urease
test by Arvind et al made the diagnosis of H. pylorieasier and simpler [11]. H.
pylori are a gram negative mobile “s “shaped bacterium which colonizes the
mucous secreting epithelial cells of the gastro duodenum. It produces a variety
of enzymes like urease, catalase,superoxide dismutaseetc of which the most
important is urease which is important in the etiopathogenesis and the
diagnosis of H. pylori by simple chemical tests.
Several diagnostic methods can be employed for the
detection of H. pylori such as non-invasive serological tests which measures
specificanti H. pylori immunoglobulin’s IgG and or IgA and invasive tests such
as bacterial culture, histopathological examination of biopsy specimen with
different stains and assays for urease activity [3].
The aim of the present study is to observe the
frequency and association of H. pylori in DU perforation cases by rapid urease test
done at the time of surgery, andhistopathology of the specimen.
Materialsand Methods
Study Setting:The
study was conducted in department ofGeneral Surgery MOSC Medical College, Kolenchery
Study Design:Retrospective
observational study
Study Period:Between
February 2015 and February 2016 were included in this study.
Sample Size50
cases of DU perforation with peritonitiswho presented to the casualty
Exclusion
Criteria:Patients with gastric ulcer perforation in
prepyloric region or perforation in any other part of bowel were excluded from
the study
Ethical
Consideration:The study was approved by the
institutional human ethics committee. Informed written consent was obtained
from all the study participants.
Study Procedure:All
the charts of the patients with perforation peritonitis were analyzed from the
medical record department for operativenotes. Case notes were identified based
on diagnosis as well as surgical procedure done.Patients with perforated
duodenal ulcer were selected and included in the study.
Patient details like age, sex, detailed history with
emphasis on previous history of acid peptic disease, past medical history,medical
treatment for acid peptic disease and physical examination wererecorded. Plain
X ray of the chest and abdomen (erect) and ultra-sonogram of the abdomen findings
were noted down into a proforma.Emergency laparotomy was done in all cases of
DU perforation.
One minute Rapid Urease test of Arvind et al was
done on table in all cases and a specimen was obtained forHisto-pathological
examination from the mucosa at the perforation site. The test was performed by
adding two drops of 1% phenol red to two ml of freshly prepared 10% w/v urea in
deionised water in a test tube at pH6.8.One minute rapid urease test detects
the presence of preformed urea produced by H. Pylori in the specimen. The
urease present hydrolyses urea in the solution with the production of ammonium
ions which raises the ph. This pH change is detected by a pH indicator, phenol
red which changes color from yellow at pH 6.8 to pink at pH 8. A color change
from yellow to pink at the end of 1 minute is considered a positive reaction. A
buffer is present in the medium to increase its stability and reduce false
positive reaction. Histopathological staining and modified Giemsa staining was done
later from the tissue excised.
Patients tested positive for the Rapid urease test
were treated with Bismuth salt+Amoxycillin+Metronidazolecombination (Triple
drug therapy) or Amoxycillin + Metronidazole+ Ranitidine.UpperGastro-intestinal
endoscopy was done in the immediate post-operativeperiod and later after two
months and mucosal biopsy specimen was obtained for the demonstration of
presence or absence of H pylori.
Results
All fifty patients with duodenal ulcer perforation
and peritonitis were taken up for emergency laparotomy and on table one minute
rapid urease test and mucosal biopsy from the perforation site weredone. As
shown in Table No.1 One minute rapid urease test was positive in a total of 35 patients
(70%) and majority of the cases reported was in the fifth decade of the life
followed by fourth decade group. The distribution of cases among gender is
shown in table no.2 depicting majority of them being male 84% of cases.
Table No1:Age wise
distribution of DU perforation cases
|
Rapid
Urease test |
|
|
Age |
Positive |
Negative |
Total |
21-30 |
04 |
NIL |
04 |
31-40 |
08 |
NIL |
08 |
41-50 |
12 |
08 |
20 |
51-60 |
04 |
05 |
09 |
61-70 |
05 |
01 |
06 |
71-80 |
01 |
01 |
02 |
81-90 |
01 |
NIL |
01 |
|
35 |
15 |
50 |
Table No2: Sex wise
distribution of DU perforation for rapid urease test
|
Rapid
urease test |
|
|
Sex |
Positive |
Negative |
Total |
Male |
30 |
12 |
42 |
Female |
05 |
03 |
08 |
|
35 |
15 |
50 |
20
patients had a previous history of acid peptic disease (57%) and 15 patients
presented with duodenal ulcer perforation for the first time without a previous
history of acid peptic disease (43%). Rapid urease test was negative in 15
patients (30%) and 10 patients among them had a previous history of acid peptic
disease and were on treatment (67%) and 5 cases were without a previous history
of acid peptic disease (33%).
It was found that all the 35 cases positive by rapid
urease were also positive For H. pylori by histopathological analysis.None of
the cases showed any intestinal metaplasia and 15 urease test negative were
histopathologically negative too.
Thus the sensitivity and specificity of rapid urease
test was found to be 100%.
Forty-five patients underwent laparotomy and perforation
closure with live omental pedicle patch and five patients were treated with
simple closure of the perforation with omental patch. Post operatively the
rapid urease positive patients were treated with H.pylori regimens and all the
patients responded well and during the follow up period of about 1 year there
was no recurrence.
Discussion
Prevalence of H. pylori in peptic ulcer disease is
60% - 90% and our study reveals aprevalence of 70% which is same as reported by
various studies[11].Association of H. pylori and duodenal ulcer perforation has
been reported to be as high as 92%, only few studies have evaluated the
prevalence of H.pylori in patients suffering from perforated peptic ulcer.
There are studies which suggest that other pathogenic factors other than
H.pylori are associated with duodenal ulcer perforation [1].
In our study also about fifteen patients (30%) were
tested Rapid urease test negative. The incidence of duodenal ulcer perforation
is more in the males (80%) and the incidence of duodenal ulcer perforation is
maximum in the 31-50 age group. Ulcer perforation incidence has been studied
over an extended period in western Scotland, UnitedKingdom and Norway who have
suggested similar trend of increased incidence rate among males [12].In men,
ulcer perforation increased until about 1950 and declined thereafter. In women
the incidence was low and fairly stable until about 1950 from which time it increased.
Increasing age among ulcer perforation patients has been observed during this
period with declining incidence among the young and increasing incidence among
the elderly [13].
Of the 50 patients with DU perforation studied for
association of H. pylori 35 were positive for rapid urease test and confirmed
by histo-pathological analysis (70%). Of the positive cases 20 patients were
known acid peptic disease patients on treatment (57%) and 15 patients presented
with DU perforation for the first time (43%).These results are comparable to
the rates mentioned in the literature77-95% sensitivity was directly
proportional to the duration of the symptoms. Rapid urease positive cases
occurred in clusters over a period April-May in our study suggesting an
infective etiology. This is comparable to the period mentioned by other studies
[14].
All cases of rapid urease positive were positive for
H. pylori by histopathology too. Sensitivity of biopsy rapid urease test is 100
%.There were no cases which showed H. pylori by histopathology were negative
for the rapid urease test.
This suggests that specificity and sensitivity for
rapid urease test approaches 100 whichis to the common observation. Marshall et
al,McNultyetal have reported sensitivity for biopsy urease test as 98% and 96%
respectively(12).Intestinal
metaplasia was not noticed in any if the rapid urease positive cases, however
chronic inflammatory cells were demonstrated in all of them suggesting that
association of H. pylori with long standing cases of acid peptic disease. Detection
of H. pylori by rapid urease test and histopathology was equally efficient and
accurate
Conclusion
The prevalence of H.pylori in DU perforation is 70%
and was seen more in those cases with a long duration of APD. The present study
shows that the risk of developing H. pylori related duodenal ulcer perforation
is strongly increased in those patients where the organism is detected by rapid
urease test in the duodenum. This finding may help us to device strategies aimed
at prevention of duodenal ulcer, the most common disease caused by H. pylori
infection. The sensitivity and specificity of One minute rapid urease test is
almost 100%
Acknowledgement-
The Department of Pathology, M.O.S.C
Medical College
Declaration
Funding:
No funding sources
Conflict of Interest:
None Declared
References
1. Gisbert JP, Pajares
JM. Helicobacter pylori infection and perforated peptic ulcer prevalence of the
infection and role of antimicrobial treatment. Helicobacter. 2003
Jun;8(3):159-67.[pubmed]
2. Saber A. Perforated
Duodenal Ulcer in High Risk Patients. InPeptic Ulcer Disease 2011. InTech.
3. Salmanroghani H,
Mirvakili M, Baghbanian M et al. Efficacy and Tolerability of Two Quadruple
Regimens: Bismuth, Omeprazole, Metronidazole with Amoxicillin or Tetracycline
as First-Line Treatment for Eradication of Helicobacter Pylori in Patients with
Duodenal Ulcer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0197096.[pubmed]
4. Pounder RE, Ng D. The
prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in different countries. Aliment
PharmacolTher. 1995;9 Suppl 2:33-9.[pubmed]
5. Moses JF, Hughes CD,
Patel PB, Chao TE, Konneh SA, Jallabah TY, et al. Surgical outcomes for
perforated peptic ulcer: A prospective case series at an academic hospital in
Monrovia, Liberia. Afr J Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;5(2):60–5.
6. Ng EK, Chung SC, Sung
JJ, et al. High prevalence of
Helicobacter pylori infection in duodenal ulcer perforations not caused by
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Br J Surg. 1996 Dec;83(12):1779-81.[pubmed]
7. Sebastian M, Chandran
VP, Elashaal YI, Sim AJ. Helicobacter pylori infection in perforated peptic
ulcer disease. Br J Surg. 1995 Mar;82(3):360-2.[pubmed]
8. Pietroiusti A, Luzzi
I, Gomez MJ, et al. Helicobacter pylori duodenal colonization is a strong risk
factor for the development of duodenal ulcer.
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02423.x
9. Taye B ,Enquselassie
F, Tsegaye A, et al. Effect of early and
current Helicobacter pylori infection on the risk of anaemia in
6.5-year-oldEthiopian children. DOI:10.1186/s12879-015-1012-y.[pubmed]
10. John B, P. Mathew B,
Chandran C. V. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer perforation.
Int Surg J. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj201744942017 Sep
27;4(10):3350.
11. McNulty CA, Dent JC,
Uff JS,et al. Detection of Campylobacter
pylori by the biopsy urease test: an assessment in 1445 patients. Gut. 1989
Aug;30(8):1058-62.[pubmed]
12. Svanes C. Trends in perforated peptic ulcer: incidence, etiology,
treatment, and prognosis. World J Surg. 2000 Mar;24(3):277-83.[pubmed]
13. Svanes C, Lie RT,
Kvåle G, et al. Incidence of perforated ulcer in western Norway, 1935-1990:
cohort- or period-dependent time trends? Am J Epidemiol. 1995 May
1;141(9):836-44.[pubmed]
14. Svanes C, Salvesen H, Stangeland L, et al. Perforated peptic ulcer over 56 years. Time trends in patients and disease characteristics. Gut. 1993 Dec;34(12):1666-71.[pubmed]
How to cite this article?
Prabhu S.G, Abraham G. Prevalence of helicobacter pylori infection in perforated duodenal ulcer in a rural hospital.
Surgical Update: Int J surg Orthopedics.2018;4(3):105-109.doi:10.17511/ijoso.2018.i3.02.