Profile of vitamin-D deficiency
patients in a tertiary care centre, Bhopal: causes and its implications
in health
Samaiya S.1, Tiwari S.2,
Singh M.3, Saran R4
1Dr. Sachin Samaiya, Department of Orthopaedics, 2Mrs. Surya Tiwari
Department of Biochemistry 3Dr.Manishi Singh, Department of
Biochemistry, 4Dr Rajat Saran, Department of Orthopedics; all
authors are affiliated with Chirayu Medical College and Hospital
Bhopal, MP, India
Address for
correspondence: Dr. Sachin Samaiya, Email:
drsachinsamaiya@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction:
Vitamin D deficiency is widespread in individuals irrespective of their
age, gender, race and geography. The aim of this study was to assess
the status of Vitamin D deficiency in various age group in the people
visiting Chirayu Medical College and Hospital, Bhopal for their routine
health check-up. Material
and Methods: This study was done in the department of
Orthopaedics and department of Biochemistry, Chirayu Medical College
and Hospital Bhopal. The study comprised of the total of 100 subjects.
Five millilitre of venous blood was collected from subjects in plain
vials (red top tube) and the serum Vitamin D level was assessed by ELFA
method using Biomeriuxminividas. Results:
Among the 100 individuals studied in this study there was 66 Females
and 34 Males. Among the study group studied it was found that approx.
25% of the total individuals studied are Vitamin D deficient i.e.
having serum vitamin D level <20 ng/ml. 20% of the individuals
in study group have insufficient vitamin D level i.e. between 20-29
ng/ml. 44% of the total individuals studied have sufficient Vitamin D
level (between 30-100 ng/ml) in their sera but in this 44% individuals
approx. 11% individuals have their serum vitamin D level in the
borderline normal range i.e. between 30-40ng/ml. Conclusion: As
Vitamin D deficiency affects all age groups, therefore, strategies such
as increasing awareness among masses about adequate exposure to
sunlight, rich dietary sources of vitamin D and fortification of foods
with Vitamin D which are consumed by majority of Indian population
irrespective of the socio-economic status can be adopted and
implemented for prevention and control of Vitamin D deficiency
throughout the nation.
Keywords:
Vitamin D, Fortification, Socioeconomic status
Manuscript Received:
6th March 2017, Reviewed:
16th March 2017
Author Corrected: 24th
March 2017, Accepted for
Publication: 31st March 2017
Introduction
Vitamin D deficiency is pandemic, yet it is the most under-diagnosed
and under-treated nutritional deficiency in the world [1].Vitamin D is
endogenously synthesized in human beings from photo conversion of
7-dehydrocholestrol in the skin to cholecalciferol on exposure to
ultraviolet radiation of sun. In a tropical country like India, where
sunlight exposure is abundant, vitamin D deficiency seems unlikely.
However, as opposed to this, various studies have highlighted that
70-100% Indians in different age groups vitamin D insufficient or
deficient [2]. The probable reasons of the wide spread vitamin D
deficiency in Indians could be because of low dietary vitamin D intake,
high fiber and phytate intake that depletes vitamin D levels [3],
reduced exposure to sunlight [4], pollution [5] or reduced exposure of
skin to sun light because of cultural and traditional habits like
“burkha” or “parda”.
The most well recognized function of 1,25(OH)2D involves regulation of
calcium and phosphorus balance for bone mineralization and remodelling.
Without adequate levels of 1, 25(OH)2D in the bloodstream, dietary
calcium cannot be absorbed. Low calcium levels lead to an increase in
serum PTH concentration, which leads to increased tubular reclamation
of calcium in kidneys and resorption from the skeleton at the cost of
lowering bone density. In the long term this leads to weakened and
brittle bones that break easily. Approximately 40%–60% of
total skeletal mass at maturity is accumulated during childhood and
adolescence. Rickets results from inadequate mineralization of growing
bone. Thus it is a childhood disease and it is manifested as bone
deformities, bone pain and weakness. Biochemical abnormalities
consistently include hypophosphatemia, elevated alkaline phophatase
levels and serum 25(OH)D levels are usually below 5 ng/mL. Chronic
vitamin D deficiency in adults results in osteomalacia, osteoporosis,
muscle weakness and increased risk of falls [6]. Epidemiological
support for skeletal benefits of vitamin D is well known [7].
Assessment of vitamin D status of an individual is best reflected by
measurement of circulating vitamin D metabolites. Only two metabolites,
namely, 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH) D] and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D
[1,25(OH)2D], have received the greatest attention in biochemical
estimation of vitamin D. Of these, the need for measuring serum
1,25(OH)2D is limited. On the other hand, serum 25(OH)D provides the
single best assessment of vitamin D status 25(OH)D as it has a
half-life of about 3 weeks, making it the most suitable indicator of
vitamin D status (4).The serum 25(OH)D cut-off <50 nmol/l or 20
ng/ml may be associated with greater risk of non-skeletal chronic
diseases [8].
The FAO/WHO expert Consultation [9] states that in most locations of
the world between 42°N and 42°S latitude there is
abundant sunshine. Exposure to sunlight is responsible for
physiological production of Vitamin D endogenously in the skin from
7-dehydrocholesterol present in the subcutaneous fat. Thirty minutes of
exposure of the skin over the arms and face to sunlight, without
application of sunscreen, preferably between 10 am to 2 pm (as maximum
ultraviolet B rays are transmitted during this time) daily is required
for adequate synthesis of vitamin D. [10]. Although vitamin D has been
traditionally considered important for skeletal health, recent studies
have reported that vitamin D also has beneficial effects on extra
skeletal tissues [11]. Several studies have suggested possible links
between vitamin D and cardiovascular disease risk [12].
The present study was done to assess the status of Vitamin D deficiency
in various age groups in the people visiting Chirayu Medical College
and Hospital, Bhopal for their routine health check-up.
Material
and Methods
This study was done in the department of Orthopaedics and department of
Biochemistry, Chirayu Medical College and Hospital Bhopal Bhopal. The
study comprised a total of 100 subjects.
Five millilitre of venous blood was collected from subjects in plain
vials (red top tube) and the serum Vitamin D level was assessed by ELFA
method using Biomeriuxminividas.
Result
This study was undertaken to determine the levels of vitamin D
deficiency in the general population visiting Chirayu Medical College
and Hospital, Bhopal for their routine health check-up. Among the 100
individuals studied in this study there was 66 Females and 34 Males. As
per the table 1, it was found that approx. 25% of the total individuals
studied are Vitamin D deficient i.e. having serum vitamin D level
<20 ng/ml. 20% of the individuals in study group have
insufficient vitamin D level i.e. between 20-29 ng/ml. 44% of the total
individuals studied have sufficient Vitamin D level (between 30-100
ng/ml) in their sera but in this 44% individuals approx. 11%
individuals have their serum vitamin D level in the borderline normal
range i.e. between 30-40ng/ml. Gender based distribution of Vitamin D
levels in study subjects is shown in table no. 2.
Table-1: Vitamin D
Deficiency among the subjects in the study
Status
|
Vitamin d level
|
Prevelance
|
Deficient
|
<20
ng/ml
|
25%
|
Insufficient
|
20-29
ng/ml
|
20%
|
Sufficient
|
30-100
ng/ml
|
44%
|
Table-2: Gender based
levels of Vitamin D in the study subjects
Status
|
Vitamin d level
|
Prevelance in males
|
Prevelance in females
|
Deficient
|
<20
ng/ml
|
7%
|
18%
|
Insufficient
|
20-29
ng/ml
|
6%
|
14%
|
Sufficient
|
30-100
ng/ml
|
17%
|
27%
|
Discussion
It is now generally accepted that vitamin D deficiency is a worldwide
health problem that affects not only musculoskeletal health but also a
wide range of acute and chronic diseases. Vitamin D Deficiency is on a
rise as a major public health problem in India. In the present study it
was found that approx. 45% of the individuals are vitamin D deficient
which is in accordance with the study conducted by Sachan A, et.al
[13]. Skin complexion, poor sun exposure, vegetarian food habits and
lower intake of vitamin D fortified foods could be attributed to the
high prevalence of Vitamin D deficiency in India [14].
Vitamin D sufficiency by dietary intake is the only tenable solution
for Indians. However, this solution itself has a barrage of problems.
Most dietary sources of vitamin D have very low vitamin D content. Most
of the food items rich in vitamin D are of animal origin. Most Indians
are vegetarians. Commonly, a dietary source of vitamin D for
vegetarians is milk, provided milk has been fortified with vitamin D.
Milk is rarely fortified with vitamin D in India. The vitamin D content
of unfortified milk is very low (2 IU/100 ml). Additionally, milk and
milk products are unaffordable to the socioeconomically
underprivileged. Another concern in India is the rampant dilution
and/or adulteration of milk and milk products.
Low dietary intake of calcium in conjunction with vitamin D
insufficiency is associated with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT).
SHPT is further exacerbated by induced destruction of 25(OH)D and
1,25(OH)2D by 24 hydroxylase [15]. 24 hydroxylase is the key enzyme of
vitamin D catabolism and is regulated by 1,25(OH)2D, PTH and FGF23
(Fibroblast Growth Factor 23) levels. FGF23 is a phosphate regulator.
High serum phosphate levels increase production of FGF23 in bone
osteocytes via the action of 1,25(OH)2D. Subsequently, FGF23 reduces
renal phosphate resorption, indirectly suppresses intestinal phosphate
absorption and also suppresses PTH and 1,25(OH)2D synthesis.
Overproduction of FGF23 can result in increased morbidity associated
with vitamin D deficiency [16]. This regulatory mechanism may explain
the low 25(OH)D levels in rural subjects on a high phytate and/or low
calcium diet, despite plentiful sun exposure. Indian diet has high
phytate content. Phytate is the principal storage form of phosphorus in
many plant tissues, especially the bran portion of grains and other
seeds. Phytate is indigestible to humans. Phytates chelate
micronutrients such as calcium and iron, and thus reduce intestinal
absorption of these nutrients. Benefits of sun exposure in rural
subjects owing to an agrarian life were seen by significantly higher
25(OH)D levels [17]. However, possibly owing to high phytate content in
diet, these levels were still insufficient in most individuals.
Possibly, high phytate content in the diet of soldiers in northern
India may have contributed to their vitamin D insufficiency, despite
adequate sun exposure, nutrition and physical exercise [18].
In the scenario of inadequate calcium intake, vitamin D insufficiency
and high phytate content in diet, environmental pollutants such as
fluoride add insult to injury. Toxins like fluoride affect bone
metabolism severely in the conjunction with inadequate calcium intake,
especially in children [19].
A study in healthy adults who received either 400 or 2000 IU/d of
vitamin D3 for 3 months in winter reported that 291 genes were either
up-regulated or downregulated. That these genes affected as many as 80
different metabolic pathways (from immune modulation to enhanced
antioxidant activity) emphasizes the importance of improving the
world’s vitamin D status [20]. The observation that
1,25(OH)2D may also influence epigenetics provides additional support
for the concept that there is no downside to increasing the vitamin D
status of children and adults. Vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy
may adversely influence placental development and fetal programming.
Vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D) deficiency has emerged as a public
health focus in recent years for its contribution to adverse skeletal
and extra-skeletal manifestations [21]. Race, age, body mass index
(BMI), latitude, diet, sunlight exposure, and skin pigmentation are all
factors influencing vitamin D status [22]. Vitamin D is important for
reducing the risk of a variety of chronic illnesses. The identification
of a Vitamin D receptor in most tissues and cells and the observation
that a multitude of genes may be directly or indirectly regulated by
1,25(OH)2D have provided a rationale for the non-skeletal health
benefits of vitamin D.
Conclusion
However, looking at the spectrum and high prevalence of Vitamin D
deficiency in India, there is a need for further research to identify
the major factors responsible for Vitamin D deficiency, despite of
abundant sunshine available in the country. As Vitamin D deficiency
affects all age groups, therefore, strategies such as increasing
awareness among masses about adequate exposure to sunlight, rich
dietary sources of vitamin D and fortification of foods with Vitamin D
which are consumed by majority of Indian population irrespective of the
socio-economic status can be adopted and implemented for prevention and
control of Vitamin D deficiency throughout the nation.
Funding:
Nil, Conflict of
interest: None initiated.
Permission from IRB:
Yes
References
1. van Schoor NM, Lips P. Worldwide vitamin D
status. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Aug;25(4):671-80.
doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2011.06.007. [PubMed]
2. G R, Gupta A. Fortification of foods with vitamin D in India.
Nutrients. 2014 Sep 12;6(9):3601-23. doi: 10.3390/nu6093601. [PubMed]
3. Khadilkar AV. (2010) Vitamin D deficiency in Indian Adolescents.
Indian Paediatr 47:756-757.
4. Ekbote VH, Khadilkar AV, Mughal MZ, Hanumante N, Sanwalka N,
Khadilkar VV, Chiplonkar SA, Kant S, Ganacharya R. Sunlight exposure
and development of rickets in Indian toddlers. Indian J Pediatr. 2010
Jan;77(1):61-5. doi: 10.1007/s12098-009-0263-2.
5. Agarwal KS, Mughal MZ, Upadhyay P, Berry JL, Mawer EB, Puliyel JM.
The impact of atmospheric pollution on vitamin D status of infants and
toddlers in Delhi, India. Arch Dis Child. 2002 Aug;87(2):111-3. [PubMed]
6. Hazell TJ, DeGuire JR, Weiler HA. Vitamin D: an overview of its role
in skeletal muscle physiology in children and adolescents. Nutr Rev.
2012 Sep;70(9):520-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00510.x. [PubMed]
7. Thacher TD, Clarke BL. Vitamin D insufficiency. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011
Jan;86(1):50-60. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0567. [PubMed]
8. Zittermann A, Schleithoff SS, Tenderich G, Berthold HK,
Körfer R, Stehle P. Low vitamin D status: a contributing
factor in the pathogenesis of congestive heart failure? J Am Coll
Cardiol. 2003 Jan 1;41(1):105-12.
9. Report of Joint FAO/ WHO expert Consultation on vitamin and mineral
requirement in human nutrition: bangkok 1998. Second Edition FAO
Rome,2004.
10. Londhey V. Vitamin D deficiency: Indian scenario. J Assoc
Physicians India. 2011 Nov;59:695-6. [PubMed]
11. Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul
19;357(3):266-81. [PubMed]
12. Kendrick J, Targher G, Smits G, Chonchol M. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D
deficiency is independently associated with cardiovascular disease in
the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Atherosclerosis. 2009 Jul;205(1):255-60. doi:
10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.10.033. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
13. Sachan A, Gupta R, Das V, Agarwal A, Awasthi PK, Bhatia V. High
prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women and their
newborns in northern India. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 May;81(5):1060-4. [PubMed]
14. Goswami R, Gupta N, Goswami D, Marwaha RK, Tandon N, Kochupillai N.
Prevalence and significance of low 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations
in healthy subjects in Delhi. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Aug;72(2):472-5. [PubMed]
15. Jones G, Prosser DE, Kaufmann M. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D-24-hydroxylase
(CYP24A1): its important role in the degradation of vitamin D. Arch
Biochem Biophys. 2012 Jul 1;523(1):9-18. doi:
10.1016/j.abb.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Nov 12. [PubMed]
16. Liao E. FGF23 associated bone diseases. Front Med. 2013
Mar;7(1):65-80. doi: 10.1007/s11684-013-0254-6. Epub 2013 Mar 9. [PubMed]
17. Harinarayan CV, Ramalakshmi T, Venkataprasad U. High prevalence of
low dietary calcium and low vitamin D status in healthy south Indians.
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2004;13(4):359-64. [PubMed]
18. Tandon N, Marwaha RK, Kalra S, Gupta N, Dudha A, Kochupillai N.
Bone mineral parameters in healthy young Indian adults with optimal
vitamin D availability. Natl Med J India. 2003 Nov-Dec;16(6):298-302. [PubMed]
19. Khandare AL, Harikumar R, Sivakumar B. Severe bone deformities in
young children from vitamin D deficiency and fluorosis in Bihar-India.
Calcif Tissue Int. 2005 Jun;76(6):412-8. Epub 2005 May 19. [PubMed]
20. Hossein-nezhad A, Spira A, Holick MF. Influence of vitamin D status
and vitamin D3 supplementation on genome wide expression of white blood
cells: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. PLoS One.
2013;8(3):e58725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058725. Epub 2013 Mar 20. [PubMed]
21. Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul
19;357(3):266-81. [PubMed]
22. Mithal A, Wahl DA, Bonjour JP, Burckhardt P, Dawson-Hughes B,
Eisman JA, El-Hajj Fuleihan G, Josse RG, Lips P, Morales-Torres J; IOF
Committee of Scientific Advisors (CSA) Nutrition Working Group. Global
vitamin D status and determinants of hypovitaminosis D. Osteoporos Int.
2009 Nov;20(11):1807-20. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0954-6. Epub 2009 Jun
19. [PubMed]
How to cite this article?
Samaiya S, Tiwari S, Singh M, Saran R. Profile of vitamin-D deficiency
patients in a tertiary care centre, Bhopal: causes and its implications
in health. Int J surg
Orthopedics.2017;3(1):19-23.doi:10.17511/ijoso.2017.i1.04.